Cuticle deposition ceases during strawberry fruit development

Background Ideally, the barrier properties of a fruit’s cuticle persist throughout its development. This presents a challenge for strawberry fruit, with their rapid development and thin cuticles. The objective was to establish the developmental time course of cuticle deposition in strawberry fruit. Results Fruit mass and surface area increase rapidly, with peak growth rate coinciding with the onset of ripening. On a whole-fruit basis, the masses of cutin and wax increase but on a unit surface-area basis, they decrease. The decrease is associated with marked increases in elastic strain. The expressions of cuticle-associated genes involved in transcriptional regulation (FaSHN1, FaSHN2, FaSHN3), synthesis of cutin (FaLACS2, FaGPAT3) and wax (FaCER1, FaKCS10, FaKCR1), and those involved in transport of cutin monomers and wax constituents (FaABCG11, FaABCG32) decreased until maturity. The only exceptions were FaLACS6 and FaGPAT6 that are presumably involved in cutin synthesis, and FaCER1 involved in wax synthesis. This result was consistent across five strawberry cultivars. Strawberry cutin consists mainly of C16 and C18 monomers, plus minor amounts of C19, C20, C22 and C24 monomers, ω-hydroxy acids, dihydroxy acids, epoxy acids, primary alcohols, carboxylic acids and dicarboxylic acids. The most abundant monomer is 10,16-dihydroxyhexadecanoic acid. Waxes comprise mainly long-chain fatty acids C29 to C46, with smaller amounts of C16 to C28. Wax constituents are carboxylic acids, primary alcohols, alkanes, aldehydes, sterols and esters. Conclusion The downregulation of cuticle deposition during development accounts for the marked cuticular strain, for the associated microcracking, and for their high susceptibility to the disorders of water soaking and cracking. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12870-024-05327-7.


Background
The cuticular membrane (CM) is a lipophilic polymer that envelops the primary surfaces of all terrestrial plants.It covers the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of leaves and of most fruit.The CM functions as a barrier to restrict water loss [1] and to protect against UV light [2] and invasion by pathogens [3].It also restricts non-stomatal gas exchange [4].Fruit appearance is markedly enhanced by the cuticle, which gives it the desirable properties of smoothness and shininess-these consumers generally associate with freshness.To exhibit these properties, the fruit cuticle must remain intact throughout development.This poses a particular challenge for fruits as these mostly continue to expand until late in their development which (depending on species) corresponds to a period of several weeks to several months.Cuticular failure-microscopic cracking, or microcracking-during this period compromises the fruit skin's barrier functions, resulting in uncontrolled water loss and shrivel, and these spoil its shiny appearance [5][6][7].Cuticular failure is also associated with increased incidence of fruit rots resulting from pathogen invasion [8,9].Cuticular failure is usually followed by russeting, as the fruit's dermal layers now differentiate to form a multicellular protective 'periderm' to regain control of water loss.However, the non-shiny, redbrown, rough-texture of the new russeted (secondary) fruit surface is usually considered by consumers to be an undesirable feature.Hence, for the grower, the economic consequences of cuticular failure are severe.
Fruit crop species differ in their patterns of cuticular deposition.For example, apple fruits typically deposit CM materials throughout development, resulting in a progressive thickening of their CMs through to maturity.Deposition generally occurs on the inner (cell wall) surface of the cuticle.As a result, the outer (older) layers of the cuticle are markedly strained whereas the inner, more recently deposited (so younger) layers are less strained [15,16].The effect of this pattern of CM deposition, is that the more-recently deposited cutin on the inner side, 'fixes' the elastic strain in the older, outer layers.This limits both the formation and the anticlinal propagation of any cuticular microcracks.
In contrast, in stone fruit, e.g., sweet cherries and European plum, CM deposition ceases early during fruit development [17,18].In consequence, their cuticles are much thinner and they become markedly strained as the fruit expands during growth [19].Strawberries are false fruits, pseudocarps, and are of unusual architecture.The strawberry 'fruit' comprises a swollen receptacle tissue (not a swollen pericarp tissue, as in a true fruit).The true fruit of a strawberry are the pips (achenes) embedded in the receptacle surface.Strawberries also differ from the other fruit crops in that they: (1) develop over a very short time period and, hence, their skins are subject to very high rates of strain; (2) have the thinnest cuticles [20] of all 'fruit' and (3) they suffer badly from surface disorders such as water-soaking and fruit-cracking, which are related to the formation of microscopic cracks in their cuticle [21,22].
Little is known about CM deposition in strawberry fruit.A better understanding of this process will help in the development of strategies to reduce their susceptibility to surface disorders and thus improve fruit quality.These strategies should have relevance to strawberry breeders (e.g., selection criteria), to growers (e.g., crop management) and to postharvest handling (e.g., storage conditions).
The objectives of our study were: (1) to establish the developmental time course of cuticle deposition in strawberry; (2) to quantify any changes in cuticular strain that occur during fruit development and (3) to identify the molecular bases for any changes in cuticle deposition and relate these to compositional changes in the cutin and wax fractions of the developing cuticle.

Results
Fruit mass and surface area increased rapidly with time following a lag phase up to about 15 days after full bloom (DAFB; Fig. 1A,B).The maximum increase in surface area occurred at about 25 DAFB as indexed by the first derivative of the sigmoidal regression model (Fig. 1B).This stage of development coincided with the onset of color change from green (hue° = 102.4± 0.14; Stage II) to white (hue° = 99.9 ± 0.36; Stage III) and to red at full maturity (hue° = 29.1 ± 1.26; Stage V) (Fig. 1C).The increase in growth rate also corresponded to a concurrent increase in soluble solids as indexed by a more negative osmotic potential (Ψπ) (Fig. 1D).
On a whole fruit basis, the masses of CM, dewaxed CM (DCM) and wax increased at a slowing rate up to about 30 DAFB, and then remained constant (Fig. 1E).However, on a unit surface area basis, the masses of CM, DCM and wax began to decrease at the onset of color change, suggesting that deposition did not keep pace with the increase in fruit surface area (Fig. 1F).
The decrease in deposition of CM, DCM and wax was accompanied by an increase in strain release (ε) after CM isolation (Fig. 1G).At maturity, the surface area of the isolated (relaxed) CM was only about half (50.3 ± 6.2%) that covered by it when previously stretched over the fruit surface (Fig. 1G).

Discussion
Our discussion focusses on the following key findings.

Cuticle deposition does not keep pace with the
increase in fruit surface area resulting in a thinning of the CM and the development of a marked strain.2. Compared with other plant species, strawberry fruit have a typical cutin composition, but an unusual wax composition.3. The decrease in cuticle deposition is accounted for by a decrease in the expressions of several cuticle related genes.

The cessation of cuticle deposition in developing strawberry results in cuticle thinning and marked strain
In strawberry, cutin and wax deposition ceased at the onset of color change.The increase in fruit surface area that occurs after cessation of cuticle deposition, essentially distributes a constant amount of cuticle over an increasing surface area.This results in a thinning of the CM and a concurrent increase in strain.In these aspects strawberries are very similar to sweet cherries [19,23,24].In contrast, the cuticle deposition pattern of tomatoes [25,26], apples [19] and mangoes [27,28] is different.In these latter fruit crops CM deposition continues throughout fruit development.The decrease in cutin deposition in strawberry is primarily accounted for by a decline in the major cutin monomer, 10,16-dihydroxyhexadecanoic acid.Likewise, in sweet cherry major cutin constituents including the midchain oxygenated hydroxy acids, such as 9(10),16-dihydroxyhexadecanoic acid and 9,10,18-trihydroxy-octadecanoic acid, decreased per unit surface area [24].The decrease in wax mass per unit surface in strawberry is primarily caused by decreases in alkanes, primary alcohols, and esters.In contrast, the decrease in sweet cherries is attributed to decreases in the triterpenes, the primary alcohols and alkanes remained constant [24].The mismatch between CM deposition and fruit surface area expansion caused marked biaxial strain of the strawberry CM.Strained CMs are inherently more susceptible to microcrack formation, particularly when exposed to liquid water or to high water vapor concentrations [18,29,30].Increased microcracking of strained cuticles during moisture exposure is related to a change in the rheological properties of the cuticle on hydration [31].In apple, cutin deposition occurs throughput development on the inner (cell wall) side of the cuticle and wax is continuously embedded in the cutin polymer [15,32].Both processes fix the elastic strain previously developed by blocking strain relaxation.In this way, they convert elastic strain into plastic strain [16,32].However, strawberries lack comparable repair mechanisms due to the cessation of cutin and wax deposition.When the cuticle is strained beyond its limit of extension, microcracking occurs and this results in impaired barrier properties and thus increased susceptibilities to water soaking, to cracking and to fruit rots.

Decreased cuticle deposition is the result of downregulation of cuticle-associated genes
We identified twelve genes potentially involved in cuticle formation in strawberries based on the functions of their orthologs.The expressions of nine of these were closely related to the rate of cutin and wax deposition both during the course of developmental and also in the cultivar comparison.These genes included three transcription factors, four genes involved in the synthesis of cutin monomers and wax constituents, and two genes involved in their transport.
Three transcriptional regulators from the APETELA2 (AP2)-domain TF superfamily, namely FaSHN1, FaSHN2 and FaSHN3, were down-regulated at the same time as the fruit changed color.There was essentially no expression of these by fruit maturity.SHINE transcription factors are regulators of CM formation [33,34].They regulate CM formation in Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum, AtSHN1 governs wax and cutin synthesis in A. thaliana [35], SlSHN2 [36] and SlSHN3 [37] that in S. lycopersicum.
The downregulation of FaLACS2 and FaGPAT3 affected cutin synthesis.In A. thaliana, AtLACS2 has been implicated in the esterification of fatty acids to coenzyme A, which is an early step in the synthesis of cutin monomers [38].Similarly, the expression of PaLACS2 in Prunus avium fruit is closely related to the rate of CM deposition [23].Also, overexpression of PaLACS2 in A. thaliana increases cutin deposition [39].The gene FaGPAT3 from strawberries shares a similarity with AtGPAT9, which participates in lipid synthesis in leaves and pollen grains [40,41].The absence of FaGPAT3 in Oryza sativa affects the formation of the CM in anthers and of exines in pollen, resulting in decreased levels of cutin monomers and wax constituents [42].
The expressions of the wax synthesis genes FaKCS10 and FaKCR1 decreased towards maturity, as did wax deposition.In A. thaliana, AtKCS10 synthesizes longchain fatty lipids [43], while AtKCR1 synthesizes very long-chain fatty acids that occur in cuticular wax [44].
The decrease in the expressions of the cutin and wax transporters FaABCG11 and FaABCG32 limited the availability of cutin and monomers for CM formation.In A. thaliana, AtABCG11 is involved in the transport of cutin monomers and wax constituents [45], while AtABCG32 is involved in the transport of only cutin monomers [46,47].
The reason why the expressions of three genes, FaLACS6 and FaGPAT6, and FaCER1, did not decrease in parallel with the decrease in cutin and wax deposition is not clear.It may be speculated that one or more of these genes is involved in the synthesis or deposition of some of those cutin and wax constituents that increased during development, i.e., perhaps of carboxylic (docosanoic acid) and ω-hydroxy acids (C16-hydroxy acid, C18:1hydroxy acid) of the cutin fraction or the C25 alkanes of the wax fraction.However, definitive evidence is lacking.Studies by Fulda et al. [48] suggest that AtLACS6 is involved in the ß-oxidation of fatty acids, but may not be directly involved in cutin and wax synthesis.AtGPAT6 is involved in CM formation, particularly in the synthesis of 2-monoacylglycerols [49].Deficiencies in SlGPAT6 result in decreased cutin deposition and thinner CMs [50].Similarly, AtCER1 is involved in the synthesis of verylong-chain alkanes [51,52].Loss of CsCER1 function in cucumber results in decreases in long-chain alkanes ranging from C25 to C33 in stems, leaves and fruits [53].We would therefore have expected FaGPAT6 and FaCER1 to be downregulated in developing strawberry fruit but this was not the case.

Strawberries have a typical composition of cutin, but an unusual composition of wax
Strawberries belong to the group of species that have a mixed cutin, comprised predominantly of C16 and C18 fatty acids [54].So, strawberry cutin composition is generally similar to that of sweet cherry [24] and peach and pear [55].Most of the monomers are midchain oxygenated hydroxyacids, notably 10,16-dihydroxyhexadecanoic acid.These hydroxyacids are also prevalent in the CMs of sweet cherries [24] and apples [56].Interestingly, in sweet cherries, 10,16-dihydroxyhexadecanoic acid is the dominant monomer, while in apples, 9,10,18-trihydroxyoctadecanoic acid is the most abundant [56].The latter is absent in strawberry cutin.
While the cutin composition of strawberry is similar to other Rosaceae fruit crops, the composition of the wax is somewhat unusual.First, strawberry wax lacks triterpenes.In many fruit crop species, triterpenes dominate the wax fraction.For example, ursolic acid dominates in apples [57], in sweet cherries [24] and in peaches [58], whereas amyrins (α-, β-type) dominate in pears [59].Second, the secondary alcohol nonacosane-10-ol is absent in strawberries, but is a typical wax constituent of fruit waxes in the CMs of the Rosaceae family [60].Third, characteristic of strawberry wax are esters ranging from C38 to C46.These are found in smaller quantities in apples [61] but not in sweet cherries [24], peaches [58] or pears [59] The alkanes found in strawberry wax are dominated by C27, C29 and C31 chain lengths, similar to those of Gaultheria mucronata [62], Nicandra physalodes, Physalis peruviana and Physalis ixocarpa [63].The decrease of wax mass per unit surface area in strawberry results primarily from decreases in alkanes, primary alcohols and esters caused by straining of the CM.
Comparing the cutin and wax yields obtained by gas chromatography with those obtained gravimetrically, revealed markedly lower yields by gas chromatography.This finding is not unique for the analyses of strawberry cutin and wax, but has also been reported for other fruit crop species [24].The lower yields in gas chromatography may be attributed to one or several of the following factors: (1) Unesterified cutin may remain unchanged by methanolysis [64], (2) there are no response factors for quantifying secondary oxygenated acids such as those found in cutin [65], and (3) some depolymerization products may have restricted volatility under the GC conditions used [66].Despite of these factors, the cutin composition identified in our study was similar to that reported by [54].

Conclusion
In strawberries cutin and wax deposition cease at about the time of color change.The cessation of cuticle deposition is caused by the downregulation of nine putative CM genes involved variously in transcriptional regulation, cutin and wax synthesis and transport.These results for strawberry are consistent across the six cultivars we investigated.The fruit surface expansion that occurs after color change results in a thinning of the cuticle and a marked increase in strain and an increase in susceptibility to microcracking when the fruit surface is exposed to surface wetness or high humidity.This causal chain explains the high susceptibility of strawberries to disorders such as water soaking and cracking and to the high incidence of fruit rots.
The developmental time courses of CM deposition, strain release, gene expression and change in cutin and wax composition were established in 'Florentina' strawberry.Fruit were sampled at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 DAFB.The developmental stages corresponded to stage I (5 and 10 DAFB), stage II (15 and 20 DAFB), stage III (25 DAFB), stage IV (30 DAFB) and stage V (35 DAFB) [67].The cultivar comparisons of expression of cuticle-related genes were conducted using 'Clery' , 'Elsanta' , 'Joly' , 'Malwina' and 'Sonsation' .These cultivars were selected because they represent major cultivars in todays strawberry production.Fruit were sampled at 20 and 35 DAFB corresponding to stages II and V.These stages represent the earliest, i.e., youngest, stage at which the analyses are technically possible (stage II) and the last stage when the strawberries are fully mature (stage V).

Phenotypic observations
Fruit fresh mass was quantified gravimetrically.Individual flowers were labelled at full bloom.Ten representative fruits were sampled every five days until maturity and weighed.Representative digitally calibrated images (Canon EOS 550D, lens: EF-S 18-55 mm, Canon Inc., Ōta, Tokyo, Japan) were taken at each time point.The fruit's [68] surface area was calculated from fruit mass using the empirical equation (Eq.1).
Color was determined in the L*, a* and b* color space (CM-2600 d; Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) and the hue angle calculated [69].
Juice was extracted from the fruit using a garlic press.The content of soluble solids (°Brix) was determined by refractometry (DR6200-T; A. Kruess Optronic, Hamburg, Germany).In a preliminary experiment the relationship between the osmotic potential of a fruit's juice and its soluble solids content was determined.A total of 650 strawberry fruit of developmental stages ranging from stage I to stage V were sampled and the osmotic potentials (Ψ π ) and soluble solids contents determined using water vapor pressure osmometry (VAPRO 5520 and 5600; Wescor, Logan, UT, USA) and refractometry (DR6200-T; A. Kruess Optronic, Hamburg, Germany).The following equation was established (Eq.2) (Data S1).This equation allows prediction of the osmotic potential of a strawberry fruit from its soluble solids content: (1) A = 5.0756 * (m) 0.6547

Cuticular membrane isolation and strain analyses
Cuticular membranes were isolated enzymatically as described below [70].An epidermal skin disc (ES) was first excised from the cheek of 'Florentina' fruit using a 4 mm diameter biopsy punch (Kai Europe, Solingen, Germany).Each ES had one achene in the center.Four ES per fruit were excised from a total of 50 fruit at each stage of development.The isolation of CM was limited to developmental the stages of 20 DAFB and beyond because of the limiting size of fruit younger than 20 DAFB.
For CM isolation, an ES was transferred to an enzyme solution containing 50 mM citric acid buffer (pH 4.0), pectinase (9%, v/v; Panzym Super E flüssig; Novozymes A/S, Krogshoejvej, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), cellulase (cellulase (0.5% v/v; Cellubrix L.; Novozymes A/S), and 30 mM NaN 3 .The ES was incubated at room temperature and the enzyme solution was refreshed periodically until all cellular debris had separated from the CM.For the final cleaning step the CMs were treated by ultrasonication at 35 kHz for 10 min (RK 510; Sonorex Super, Bandelin electronic, Berlin, Germany).Once complete separation was achieved, the CMs were thoroughly rinsed in deionized water.The achenes were removed by hand.The CM samples were dried for 48 h above dry silica gel at 22 °C, and subsequently weighed on a microbalance (M2P; Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany).The experiment was carried out with 10-12 replicates where each replicate comprised five CM discs.
Wax was extracted by incubating the CM discs in a 1:1 CHCl 3 /MeOH (v:v) solution.The DCM so obtained were dried above dry silica gel and weighed.The mass of the wax was determined by subtracting the mass of the DCM from that of the CM.
The apparent biaxial strain release (ε;%) resulting from CM isolation was quantified according to Lai et al. [19].Briefly, a hydrated CM was transferred to a microscope slide, flattened using a coverslip.Digital calibrated images were prepared using a binocular microscope (MZ10F; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a digital camera (DP73; Olympus; Tokio, Japan).The area of the flattened disc after isolation (A CM ) was measured by image analysis (cellSens Dimension 1.18; Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions, Münster, Germany).The value of ε was calculated from Eq. 3, where A CM represents the area of the isolated CM and A 0 the area of the disc on the fruit before excision (i.e., the area of the biopsy punch).
To establish the effect of the achene cavity on the apparent biaxial strain release, a preliminary experiment (2) �π(MPa) = 0.3292 − 0.0421xBrix − 0.0088xBrix 2 + 0.0002xBrix 3 was done using fruit with achene cavities ranging from very deep to shallow.The A 0 value was assumed to represent the surface area of a truncated cone having a base diameter of 4 mm (equivalent to the diameter of the biopsy punch).Meanwhile A CM was measured by making incisions in the CM disc and flattening the CM on the slide.The preliminary experiment revealed that accounting for the surface area of the achene cavity had no significant effect on the extent of strain release in the CM, calculated using the cross-sectional area of the biopsy punch as an estimate for A 0 and the area of the CM without incisions as an estimate of A CM (Data S2).

RNA Isolation
Fruit skin samples (40-60 mg per replicate) were excised from the region of the fruit that was of maximum diameter ('cheek') using a razor blade.Skin sections were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen.The achenes were removed under liquid nitrogen prior to RNA extraction.The InviTrap Spin Plant RNA Mini Kit (STRATEC Molecular, Berlin, Germany) was used for RNA isolation according to the manufacturer's protocol.Residual genomic DNA was removed with DNase using the DNA-free ™ Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).The quantity and quality of RNA were assessed using a Nanodrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) by measuring the absorbance at 230, 260 and 280 nm.RNA integrity was evaluated on a 1.5% agarose gel.cDNA synthesis was performed using the LunaScript ® RT SuperMix Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), incorporating 600 ng of total RNA in a 40 µL reaction volume following the manufacturer's protocol.Experiments were conducted using three replicates each comprised of six skin sections taken from six individual fruit per replicate.
Gene expression was quantified by quantitative realtime PCR, employing the QuantStudio ™ 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).For each gene, three replicates were analyzed with two to three technical replicates.Gene expression (3) data were normalized based on the reference genes FaHISTH4 (AB197150.

Identification and quantification of wax constituents
The CMs were isolated from 'Florentina' fruit sampled at 20 and 35 DAFB (equiv.to stage II and stage V).Wax was extracted from 1 to 4.5 mg samples of CM in 5 mL CHCl 3 at room temperature on a horizontal rolling bench (CAT RM. 5-30 V, Staufen, Germany) overnight.To facilitate the subsequent quantification of individual wax constituents, an internal standard of tetracosane (100 µL of 10 mg tetracosane in 50 mL CHCl 3 ) was added.The volume of CHCl 3 was gradually reduced under a gentle stream of N 2 at 60 °C.The DCMs were dried on Teflon discs for further analysis of cutin monomers.Wax samples were derivatized by silylation, resulting in the corresponding trimethylsilyl ethers and esters.Next, 20 µL BSTFA (N, O-bis(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamid; Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and 20 µL pyridine (Sigma Aldrich; Deisenhofen, Germany) were added to each sample and incubated for 45 min at 70 °C.For quantification 1 µL of each derivatized sample was injected on-column into a gas chromatograph coupled to a flame ionization detector (GC-FID; CG-Hewlett Packard 5890 series H, Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 307 column-type: 30 m DB-1 i.d.0.32 mm, film 0.2 µm; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA).Wax constituents were identified by GC-MS (Quadrupole mass selective detector HP 5971, Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with 1 µL injected on-column.Quantification of constituents was achieved using the internal standard, and molecule identification relied on the comparison of fragmentation patterns with literature data and an in-house data library.The number of replicates was five, where each replicate represented ten CM discs.

Identification and quantification of cutin monomers
Following wax extraction, the DCMs were transesterified by incubation in 1 mL BF 3 /MeOH for 16 h at 70 °C.As an internal standard, 20 μg of dotriacontane (100 μL of 10 mg dotriacontane in 50 mL CHCl 3 ) was added.The depolymerization of cutin was stopped by adding 2 mL of saturated NaHCO 3 to the methanolysate.Cutin monomers were extracted with 3 × 2 mL CHCl 3 .The resulting CHCl 3 phase was separated, rinsed with 1 mL HPLC-grade water, dried with Na 2 SO 4 , and concentrated under a stream of N 2 at 60 °C.Subsequently, samples were derivatized according to the previously mentioned procedure.Quantification of monomers and constituents involved GC-FID, and identification was carried out using GC-MS, as detailed above.Fragmentation patterns were analyzed comparing them with both published data and our in-house library.Data were normalized relative to the internal standard and expressed per unit fruit surface area.The number of replicates was four (20 DAFB) or five (35 DAFB), where each replicate comprised a pool of ten CMs discs.

Data analysis
Means between time points were compared using Student's t-test at p ≤ 0.05 (R version 3.6.1;R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; [76]).The data in the figures are presented as means ± standard errors.

Fig. 1 3 .
Fig. 1 Developmental time course of increase in strawberry fruit mass and surface area, change in skin color, osmotic potential, deposition of the cuticular membrane (CM), the dewaxed cuticular membrane (DCM), and the wax on a whole-fruit basis and on a unit surface-area basis, and strain relaxation of the CM.A Photographs of typical fruit sampled at stage I (5 and 10 days after full bloom (DAFB)), stage II (15 and 20 DAFB), stage III (25 DAFB), stage IV (30 DAFB), and stage V (35 DAFB).B Fruit mass and surface area.The sigmoidal regression equations were: Mass(g) = 29.0

Fig. 4 Fig. 5
Fig. 4 Cutin composition of skins excised from developing strawberry fruit.The composition of cutin was analyzed at 20 days after full bloom (DAFB, stage II) and at maturity 35 DAFB (stage V).Data represent means ± SE.The asterisk '*' indicates significant differences between 20 and 35 DAFB at p ≤ 0.05 (Student's t-test)